Writing

• Yu, Q., Schlotterbeck, F., Wang, H., Reichmann, N., Stolterfoht, B., Eckardt, R. & Butt, M. (2024). Ad Hoc Compounds for Stance Detection. Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Multiword Expressions and Universal Dependencies (MWE-UD 2024)
• Ramotowska, S., Archambeau, K., Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F., Berberyan, H., Van Maanen, L. & Szymanik, J. (2024). Testing two-step models of negative quantification using a novel machine learning analysis of EEG. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience doi: 10.1080/23273798.2024.2345302
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Wang, H. (2023). An incremental RSA model for adjective ordering preferences in referential visual context. In Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, 6(12). doi: 10.7275/1why-1g73
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Augurzky, P. (2023). Reading times show effects of contextual complexity and uncertainty in comprehension of German universal quantifiers. In Knowlton, T. Schwarz, F. & Papafragou, A. (eds): Proceedings of Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 2. doi: 10.3765/elm.2.5392
• Balbach, N., Schlotterbeck, F., Wang, H. & Bott, O. (2022). Disentangling semantic empty-set effects in quantifier comprehension. In Degano, M., Roberts, T., Sbardolini, G. & Schouwstra, M. (eds): Proceedings of the 23rd Amsterdam Colloquium.
• Schlotterbeck, F., Augurzky, P. & Ulrich, R. (2022). Degree of incrementality is modulated by experimental context – ERP evidence from German quantifier restriction. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2125541
• Schlotterbeck, F., Ramotowska, S., Van Maanen, L. & Szymanik, J. (2020). Representational complexity and pragmatics cause the monotonicity effect. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pdf).
• Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F. & Ulrich, R. (2020). Most (but not all) quantifiers are interpreted immediately in visual context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1722846
• Bott, O., Schlotterbeck, F. & Klein, U. (2019). Empty set effects in quantifier interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 36(1), 99–163.  doi: 10.1093/jos/ffy015
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2018). Turning adults into children: Evidence for resource-based accounts of errors with universal quantification. In Katalin É. Kiss & Tamás Zétényi (eds.), Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Vol. 47.  Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Quantification (pp. 193–216). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91566-1
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2017). From truth conditions to processes: how to model the processing difficulty of quantified sentences based on semantic theory. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen. doi:10.15496/publikation-18745
• Franke, M., Schlotterbeck, F., & Augurzky, P. (2017). Embedded Scalars, Preferred Readings and Prosody: An Experimental Revisit, 34(1), 153–199, Journal of Semantics. doi:10.1093/jos/ffw007
• Bott, O., & Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). The processing domain of scope interaction. Journal of Semantics, 32(1), 39–92. doi:10.1093/jos/fft015
• Bott, O., Klein, U., & Schlotterbeck, F. (2013). Witness Sets, Polarity Reversal and the Processing of Quantified Sentences. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2013 (pp. 59–66).
• Schlotterbeck, F., & Bott, O. (2013). Easy Solutions for a Hard Problem? The Computational Complexity of Reciprocals with Quantificational Antecedents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 22(4), 363–390. doi:10.1007/s10849-013-9181-9
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2012). Incremental truth value judgments. In B. Stolterfoht & S. Featherston (eds.): Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory - Studies in Meaning and Structure (pp. 3–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614510888.3
• Bott, O., Schlotterbeck, F. & Szymanik, J. (2011). Interpreting tractable versus intractable reciprocal sentences. In J. Bos & S. Pullum (eds.): Proceedings of IWCS 9 (pp. 75–84, pdf from acl anthology)

Talks

• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2024). Variation in the processing of zero-models? Invited talk presented at the NihiL Workshop, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2023). Empty-set effects in quantifier interpretation: current results and future directions. Invited talk presented at the NihiL Seminar, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
• Yu, Q., Schlotterbeck, F., Eckardt, R. & Stolterfoht, B. (2022). An experimental study on ad hoc compounds in political discourse. 9th Experimental Pragmatics Conference. IUSS Pavia, Italy.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2022). Effects of linguistic meaning on decision processes in verification tasks. Invited talk presented at Colloquium for Empirical English Linguistics, Department of English and American Studies, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2022). Less than a Sentence is not Enough - An Eyetracking Study on the Incremental Interpretation of Negative Expressions. Invited talk presented at Department of English and American Studies, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott O. (2022). Less than a Sentence is not Enough - An Eyetracking Study on the Incremental Interpretation of Negative Expressions. Talk presented at Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 2, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2021). Composition in Realtime – The Case of Quantifier Interpretation. Invited talk presented at the Closing Conference of the SFB 833.
• Schlotterbeck, F., Ramotowska, S., Van Maanen, L. & Szymanik, J. (2020). Is the monotonicity effect due to covert negation or pragmatic bias? Talk presented at the Second Tsinghua Interdisciplinary Workshop on Logic, Language, and Meaning: Monotonicity in Logic and Language.
• Schlotterbeck, F., Ramotowska, S., Van Maanen, L. & Szymanik, J. (2020). Is the monotonicity effect due to covert negation or pragmatic bias? Talk presented at the 33rd Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2019). Decision processes in quantifier verification. Invited talk presented at the Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2019). Decision processes in quantifier verification. Invited talk presented at the Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group, Artificial Intelligence Department, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2019). Vagueness and competetition in the understanding of spatial prepositions. Invited talk presented at the Institute for Language, Logic and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2019). Decision processes in quantifier verification.Invited talk presented at the Institute for Language, Logic and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott, O. (2018). Is relative scope assigned incrementally? Talk presented at ESSLLI 2018, workshop on Quantity in Language and Thought, University “St. Kl. Ohridski”, Sofia.
• Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F. & Ulrich, R.  (2018). Most (but not all) quantifiers are interpreted immediately in visual context. Talk presented at the workshop The Pragmatics of Quantifiers: Implicature and Presupposition – Experiment and Theory, Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2017). Processes involved in the verification of modified numerals. Invited talk presented at the kick-off workshop Cognitive Semantics and Quantities, University of Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2017). Towards a general model of the processing difficulty of quantified sentences. Invited talk presented at the Institute for Language, Logic and Computation, University of Amsterdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2017). Empirical evaluation of various approaches to the processing difficulty of quantified sentences and an integrated processing model of comparative modified numerals. Invited talk presented at the University of Amsterdam.
• Bott, O., Klein, U. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). Processing difficulty in the interpretation and verification of empty set quantifiers. Talk presented at ESSLLI 2015, workshop on Experimental Approaches to Semantics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). Online processing at the syntax-semantics interface - Evidence from scope interaction in German. Talk presented at the Division of Labour (DoL) conference, University of Tübingen.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). The process of evaluating comparative quantifiers. Talk presented at ESSLLI 2015, workshop on Experimental Approaches to Semantics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
• Bott, O., Klein, U. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2013). Witness Sets, Polarity Reversal and the Processing of Quantified Sentences. Invited talk, University of Konstanz.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott, O. (2013). An easy solution for a hard problem? The computational complexity of reciprocal sentences with quantified antecedents. Talk presented at the Workshop on Artificial Grammar Learning, University of Tübingen.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott, O. (2012). Easy solutions for a hard problem? The computational complexity of reciprocals with quantificational antecedents. Talk presented at ESSLLI 2012, workshop on Logic and Cognition, University of Opole.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2012). Bound variable interpretations under inverse scope. Talk presented at the workshop Variables at the Interface Between Form and Meaning, University of Tübingen.
• Bott, O., Schlotterbeck, F. & Szymanik, J. (2011). Interpreting tractable versus intractable reciprocal sentences. Ninth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS 9), University of Oxford.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2011). Why is 'fewer than n' more difficult to falsify than 'more than n'? Third Workshop on Semantic Processing, Logic and Cognition, University of Tübingen.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott, O. (2010). Investigations into the Computational Complexity of Quantifying Expressions. CUNY 2010: Conference on Human Sentence Processing , New York University.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2010). Incremental Truth Value Judgments. Fourth conference on Linguistic Evidence, University of Tübingen.

Poster

• Wang, H. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2024). Exploring Communicative Efficiency in Adjective Ordering Preferences in Visual Referential Contexts: An Experimental and Computational Approach. Poster presented at 2024 CORE Project Workshop: "Unpacking Efficient Communication: The Roles of Cognitive Bias and Extralinguistic Context in Referring Expression Choice", Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
• Wang, H. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2022). Even with subjective adjectives precedence precedes dominance in preferred orderings. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, University of York.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Augurzky, P. (2022). Reading times show effects of contextual complexity and uncertainty in comprehension of German universal quantifiers. Poster presented at Experiments in Linguistic Meaning 2. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
• Ramotowska, S., Archambeau, K., Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F., Berberyan, H., Van Maanen, L., Szymanik, J. (2022). Discovering stages of processing in quantified sentences. Poster presented at the 18th Winter Conference of the Dutch Society for Brain and Cognition.
• Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott O. (2020). Less than a Sentence is not Enough - An Eyetracking Study on the Incremental Interpretation of Negative Expressions. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, University of Potsdam.
• Schlotterbeck, F. (2019). Vagueness and competition in the understanding of spatial prepositions. Poster presented at “Rational Approaches in Language Science” 2019, Saarland University.
• Berezovskaya, B., Schlotterbeck, F. & Bott, O. (2018). Processing of ambiguous degree constructions in German. Poster presented at Linguistic Evidence 2018, University of Tübingen.
• Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F. & Ulrich, R. (2018). Is it easier to think positive? An ERP study on quantifier processing in German. Poster presented at CUNY 2018, University of California, Davis.
• Augurzky, P., Schlotterbeck, F. & Ulrich, R. (2016). Degree of incrementality is modulated by experimental context - ERP evidence from German quantifier restriction. Poster presented at AMLaP 2016, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Bilbao.
• Bott, O., Klein, U. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2014). Witness sets, polarity reversal and the processing of multiply quantified sentences. Poster presented at Linguistic Evidence 2014, University of Tübingen.
• Bott, O., Klein, U. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2013). A processing model of quantificational complexity: Offline and online evidence. Poster presented at AMLaP 2013, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseilles.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2012). Limits to the interpretation of reciprocal sentences with quantificational antecedents. Poster presented at Linguistic Evidence 2012, University of Tübingen.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2011). The time course of quantifier-quantifier interaction. Poster presented at the AMLaP 2011, Paris Descartes University.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2010). There is less scope ambiguity than is commonly assumed. Poster presented at CUNY 2010, University of New York.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2009). The processing domain of scope interaction. Poster presented at CUNY 2009, University of California, Davis.
• Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2009). The processing domain of aspectual coercion. Poster presented at CUNY 2009, University of California, Davis.

Edited

• Freitag, C. & Bott, O. & Schlotterbeck, F. (2017, eds.). Two perspectives on V2: The invited talks of the DGfS 2016 workshop “V2 in grammar and processing: Its causes and its consequences”. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.